THE MICHAEL JACKSON REASON WHY PIERS MORGAN CAN’T APPRECIATE BAD BUNNY’S SUPER BOWL 60 ‘SPECTACLE’

Piers Morgan’s mixed reaction to Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl 60 halftime show revealed more about his personal benchmark than the performance itself.

The broadcaster’s comments showed that while he admired the production, one historic standard continues to shape how he judges every halftime spectacle that follows.

Piers Morgan sets Michael Jackson benchmark

Explaining his view on X, Piers Morgan made it clear that his appreciation of Bad Bunny’s show came with a significant caveat.

“I thought the spectacle/theatre/choreography was best ever. But the greatest half-time show was Michael Jackson, then Prince,” Morgan wrote.

The comment framed Morgan’s position neatly. While he acknowledged that Bad Bunny delivered an exceptional visual and theatrical performance, his reference point remains rooted in past icons.

Michael Jackson’s 1993 Super Bowl appearance is widely regarded as a turning point for halftime shows, transforming them into global pop culture events. Prince’s 2007 performance is often placed in the same rare category.

By invoking those two names, Morgan effectively explained why Bad Bunny’s show, no matter how ambitious or culturally significant, could never fully surpass his personal hierarchy.

Piers Morgan still praised Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl show

Despite the comparison, Morgan had already clarified his enthusiasm in another post shared on X, pushing back against claims that he dismissed the performance.

“Couldn’t disagree more, Mr President. I absolutely loved Bad Bunny’s halftime show. Amazing (best in Super Bowl history?) theatre/choreography, great energy, superbly confident performance, and a very welcome unifying message. Oh, and Spanish is 1st language for 50m+ Americans!” he tweeted.

Morgan praised the energy, confidence, and inclusivity of the show, even floating the idea that it could rank among the very best.

His emphasis on Spanish as a first language for tens of millions of Americans also positioned Bad Bunny’s performance as culturally relevant rather than divisive.

Taken together, Morgan’s comments were less contradictory than they first appeared. He admired the execution and message, but his emotional ceiling remains defined by the formative impact of Jackson and Prince.

The reaction underlined a broader truth about halftime debates. Appreciation often depends not just on what happens on stage, but on the memories viewers bring with them.

Read more:

・Jake Paul blames his X account amid fresh ‘fake’ take about Bad Bunny

・How Adam Sandler reacted to Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl 60 halftime show

・Robert Griffin III reacts to real-life wedding during Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl halftime show

2026-02-10T10:07:11Z